| Rules or Rights |
|
|
|
| Written by Katfish | |||||||||
| Saturday, 13 March 2010 23:45 | |||||||||
|
In my last blog, “Catching Chain”, I mentioned that I was going to be transferred for my own “safety”. You may recall that “safety” issue was explained to me as a semi-sincere concern that a certain Guard (or Guards) might seek revenge against me, setting me up for numerous, petty, and certainly contrived shots, possibly even “planting evidence”. Since I wrote that blog, I’ve had time to contemplate this reasoning and I’ve come to the conclusion that if the Prison’s Senior Officers KNOW certain Guard(s) are capable of this type of unethical behavior (vandalized cars inclusive), then really, shouldn’t it be the Senior Officers responsibility to remove said Guards from the compound, from all Guard/Convict interactions, perhaps even terminating the Guard(s) employment altogether? Fuck yeah, I’m right. I know it. You know it. And the Senior Officers damn sure know it. Even so, they’re not taking the appropriate steps to remove the unfit Guards. Instead they’re removing me (which I don’t give a fuck about, of course). Here’s breaking news: I am NOT the problem. Knock knock knock- Hey, McFly! Are you receiving on this frequency? Removing me WON’T solve the problem; it was here before I arrived. I’m just the one who chose to not take the boolshit. I’m the one who brought it out into the open. I’ll tell you something else; the problem will still be here long after I’m gone. Think about that.
There is a possible second scenario here. It’s only my theory, but I’m entitled to it. Tell me what you think. Perhaps the Senior Officers, the wanna-be-wardens and possibly even the Warden find it far easier to focus all of my attention and unethical Guard(s) and my own “safety” rather than admit to First Amendment Rights violations. I was put in the bucket for the blogs I wrote, no question about that. The “SIS Investigation” clause holds no mud. I say that because the truths I publicized freaked the BOP out and no matter what, they had to silence me anyway they could…. Look at it like this: I am in the Bucket. The Kat three cells down from me is in the Bucket. He is in for fighting. Me for writing. We both have lost all privileges. But the Kat that is in for fighting, he knows he was in the wrong. He also knows when his punishment time will end. My punishment doesn’t yet have an end in sight. Yet, to hear the Senior Officers tell it, Katfish (that’s me) is NOT being punished; I’m in for “SIS Investigation”. (SIS? Perhaps it’s an acronym for “Systematic Inaccuracy & Subterfuge”.) The BOP feels as if a misleading and ambiguous “label” changes reality. It does not. I AM being punished for exercising First Amendment rights. My safety plays no part in being Segged.
Now, even though I’ve been accused of being many things in my life, I’ve never been accused of being a reporter. Moreover, this “rule”, penned by some BOP Official somewhere, clearly shows that the DOJ believes they have the power to write an arbitrary regulation that supersedes the Bill of Rights, particularly the First Amendment. Can you believe the arrogance of the BOP/DOJ?
TFTC has requested that I continue to provide them with additional blogs. I have every intention of doing so. Peace out.
Ever On
~~Nikita~~ Tags:
Powered by !JoomlaComment 4.0alpha3
!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."
|
|||||||||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:04 |
















